Prove if F is Differentiable F Exists and is Continuous Local Maximum F C 0
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Forums
- Homework Help
- Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Prove that f is uniformly differentiable
- Thread starter Jamin2112
- Start date
Homework Statement
Suppose f ' is continuous on [a, b] and ε > 0. Prove that there exists ∂ > 0 such that | [f(t)-f(x)]/[t-x] - f '(x) | < ε whenever 0 < |t - x| < ∂, a ≤ x ≤ b, a ≤ t ≤ b.
Homework Equations
Definitions of continuity and differentiability
The Attempt at a Solution
Fix x in [a, b] and ε > 0. Since f ' is continuous at x, there exists a ∂ > 0 such that |f '(x) - f '(t) | < ε whenever 0 < |x - t| < ∂, a ≤ t ≤ b.
Now I'm not sure how this gets me | [f(t)-f(x)]/[t-x] - f '(x) | < ε. I've tried a lot of different things. Can you give me an itsy bitsy hint?
Answers and Replies
What is the definition of f'(x)?
limt-->x [f(t)-f(x)]/(t-x), provided the limit exists, and I don't know that it does exist in this instance.
That implies the limit exists.
Now what is the definition of the corresponding limit?
It is given that f' is continuous on [a,b].
That implies the limit exists.Now what is the definition of the corresponding limit?
f '(x) = limt-->x [f(t)-f(x)]/[t-x],
so |f '(t) - f '(x)| = | limp-->x [f(p)-f(x)]/[p-x] - limq-->t [f(q)-f(t)]/[q-t] |. In other words, if we choose ε > 0 then for some ∂ > 0 we've simultaneously have
| [f(p)-f(x)]/[p-x] - f '(x) | < ε
and
| [f(q)-f(t)]/[q-t] - f '(t) | < ε
whenever
0 < |p - x|< ∂
and
0 < |q - t| < ∂.
It is given that f' is continuous on [a,b].
That implies the limit exists.
So you're saying that f ' exists on [a, b], which is what we're trying to prove in the first place ..... (?)
So you're saying that f ' exists on [a, b], which is what we're trying to prove in the first place ..... (?)
Your problem statement does not ask you to proof that f' exists.
It asks to proof that some expression with epsilon turns out true.
As for the existence of f'.
What is the definition of continuity (for f')?
f '(x) = limt-->x [f(t)-f(x)]/[t-x],so |f '(t) - f '(x)| = | limp-->x [f(p)-f(x)]/[p-x] - limq-->t [f(q)-f(t)]/[q-t] |. In other words, if we choose ε > 0 then for some ∂ > 0 we've simultaneously have
| [f(p)-f(x)]/[p-x] - f '(x) | < ε
and
| [f(q)-f(t)]/[q-t] - f '(t) | < εwhenever
0 < |p - x|< ∂
and
0 < |q - t| < ∂.
That is not the definition of the corresponding limit.
Suppose ##L = \lim\limits_{t \to x} ~ g(t)##.
What is the definition of this limit?
Your problem statement does not ask you to proof that f' exists.
It asks to proof that some expression with epsilon turns out true.
I actually didn't write down the entire problem. In parentheses it then says "This could be expressed by saying that f is uniformly differentiable on [a, b]." You're telling me that f is uniformly differentiable on [a, b] since f ' is continuous (and thus existant) on [a, b]. Right?
That is not the definition of the corresponding limit.Suppose ##L = \lim\limits_{t \to x} ~ g(t)##.
What is the definition of this limit?
L is the number for which |L - g(t)| can be made as small we'd like with the appropriate ∂ > 0 and t within the range 0 < |t - x| < ∂.
I actually didn't write down the entire problem. In parentheses it then says "This could be expressed by saying that f is uniformly differentiable on [a, b]." You're telling me that f is uniformly differentiable on [a, b] since f ' is continuous (and thus existant) on [a, b]. Right?
I'm only telling you that f is differentiable on [a,b] since f' is continuous (and thus existant) on [a, b].
"Uniformly" is as yet not in your problem statement.
L is the number for which |L - g(t)| can be made as small we'd like with the appropriate ∂ > 0 and t within the range 0 < |t - x| < ∂.
Yes. From this definition the epsilon expression in your problem statement follows immediately.
That is, pending on the meaning of the word "whenever" - I'm not sure what that means.
Did you perhaps intend "for every t and x"?
So this does not yet mean "uniformly differentiable".
Do you have a definition handy for that?
Given x in [a, b] and ε > 0:
f ' is defined on [a, b], so f is continuous on [a, b] (Theorem 5.10), so the Mean Value Theorem can be applied on any subinterval of [a, b]
f ' is continuous on [a, b], so there is a ∂1 > 0 such that | f '(x) - f '(t) | < ∂1 whenever 0 < |t - x| < ∂1.
f '(x), f '(t) of course exist, so there exist ∂2, ∂3 > 0 such that
whenever
and
Somehow I can cut and paste the information (possibly changing ε to ε/2 or something else during the process, possibly invoking the Mean Value Theorem) and obtain
I'm just not sure how to do it because it's ton of information, some of it possibly unnecessary. But I'm close, aren't I?
Also, I hope I don't get drunk and forget to turn in my homework, as was often the case last quarter.
In particular it needs to hold for any t and x in [a,b] with 0<|t-x|<δ, but I'm not seeing anything where you addressed that.
Well, I'm still not seeing the definition of uniform differentiability...In particular it needs to hold for any t and x in [a,b] with 0<|t-x|<δ, but I'm not seeing anything where you addressed that.
I started with an arbitrary x in [a, b], then picked a t with 0<|t-x|<∂. That, or vice versa (pick t in [a, b] and then an x satisfying 0<|t-x|<∂), should be the correct way.
Suggested for: Prove that f is uniformly differentiable
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Last Post
- Forums
- Homework Help
- Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/prove-that-f-is-uniformly-differentiable.565828/
0 Response to "Prove if F is Differentiable F Exists and is Continuous Local Maximum F C 0"
Post a Comment